966 Startups Died Last Year. The Pattern Is Always the Same.
The startup failure rate is up 25.6%. Analysis reveals the universal pattern: linguistic decay in updates, biological denial mechanisms, and metrics ignored until death. The data always knows.
966 startups shut down in 2024. That’s a 25.6% jump from 2023. Enterprise SaaS led the massacre at 32%. I noticed the predictable pattern behind every shutdown: founders who saw death coming but couldn't stop denying it. Founders confuse optimism with denial.
When I researched more, I found an interesting language of dying startups. Watch any startup's investor updates before shutdown. The linguistic decay follows a precise pattern:
12 months before shutdown: "We closed 12 new enterprise accounts with an average ACV of $45K"
9 months before: "Enterprise pipeline remains robust with several opportunities in late stages"
6 months before: "Pursuing strategic enterprise opportunities while optimizing our sales process"
3 months before: "Focused on strategic initiatives to accelerate growth"
And final updates to investors and stakeholders would be missing on the day founders or senior management are supposed to send the updates.
The pattern is: active voice becomes passive, and specifics/stats dissolve into vague initiatives. Usually, at this time, the present tense shifts to the future conditional and is followed by a long silence.
There’s an insightful report on InVision, and their story exemplifies this pattern. They raised $115M at a $1.9B valuation in 2018. By 2022, users reported the product had grown stale while Figma dominated. InVision's updates likely shifted from product metrics to "strategic positioning" before the 2024 shutdown.
The Biological Basis of Denial
When a founder's company struggles, the brain's amygdala, which is responsible for threat detection, dampens its response under chronic stress. In these hard times, founders literally lose the ability to process negative information accurately. According to Forbes, 72% of entrepreneurs face mental health issues, and it’s a mind-boggling high number.
This situation usually results in two realities existing simultaneously. The metrics show failure, but the founder's brain interprets it as progress, digested with optimism. And finally, this cognitive dissonance manifests physically:
Sleep disorders in 68% of struggling founders
Weight fluctuation in 44%
Anxiety symptoms in 81%
Decision-making impairment in 73%
Research confirms 42% of founders experience burnout monthly. This is not happening due to overwork but from maintaining dual realities.
"As soon as you stop communicating with investors, they're going to write you off." But founders don't stop communicating by choice. They stop because every truthful update would reveal failure.
Observation by Ben Yoskovitz
Another interesting pattern emerged from the data and research by Carta. Startups that raised funds in 2021’s peak struggled to raise money in 2023-2024 due to a synchronized burnout period of 18-24 months.
But when examined more deeply, they found something fascinating. These founders couldn't accept lower valuations. Not because of their greed but because of identity fusion. Once a founder accepts a $50M valuation, their self-worth merges with that number. Taking a down round feels like personal failure, and not a market correction.
Everyone Knows Except the Founder
483 startup post-mortems reveal a consistent theme: Employees, investors, and customers see the failure coming months before the founders do because founders have “protective delusion,” a psychological phenomenon where the brain changes to protect the ego from reality. It’s like the immune system attacking the truth instead of real dangers.
And the cruel irony is, this protection mechanism accelerates the very failure it seeks to prevent. This pattern has happened several times, even in 2024.
Tally: $172M raised, failed due to poor unit economics
Moxion Power: Overexpansion despite weak fundamentals
Lilium: $1B+ invested in unproven technology
Founders need to break the pattern
Research on successful pivots shows that founders who acknowledge reality early have dramatically better outcomes:
67% successfully pivot when recognizing failure signals within 6 months
23% achieve acquisitions or asset sales
10% return meaningful capital to investors
Most startups fail because they build products nobody wants. The other failures stem from various causes, but share one element: founders who couldn't process reality.
The pattern is always the same.
The data gets worse, the story gets better. Until the story ends.
Your metrics are speaking. The question remains: Are you actively listening, or composing another update about "strategic initiatives"?
References:
https://www.cbinsights.com/research/startup-failure-post-mortem/
https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/26/2025-will-likely-be-another-brutal-year-of-failed-startups-data-suggests/
https://carta.com/data/startup-shutdowns-q1-2024/
https://lifehackmethod.com/blog/entrepreneur-mental-health-statistics/
If you found this insightful, you might also like this:
